Friday, October 14, 2022

"Devout Catholics" and the Scandal They Bring

America’s founding fathers, after successfully fighting a war to free our newly formed nation from the chains of tyranny, were adamant that we the people would not replace one tyrannical regent with an equally tyrannical federal government over our nascent nation.  Out of that legitimate concern, the brilliant United States Constitution was written to limit the role of what the federal government could and should do and to further enshrine in our Bill of Rights what our rights were that the government was sworn to protect under this new constitution.

One of our 1st amendment rights as Americans is the “right of the people peaceably to assemble”.  As such, America has many such groups, clubs, professional societies, service organizations, and institutions of faith where like-minded people are free to assemble in furtherance of their intended causes.  Many of these groups and faith organizations have developed their own by-laws and codes of conduct in order to be a member in good standing with that said group. 

The Roman Catholic Church is one such group.  Indeed, the very church built on the rock of Peter by Jesus Christ himself has long established such rules and codes that a Christian is to live by if he or she is to remain faithful to God and His teachings.  These teachings are encoded in Sacred Scripture, Sacred Tradition, and the Catechism of the Catholic Church for anyone to read. 

One of these teachings regards the mortal sin of abortion.  The Catechism specifically states the following,

“2270  Human life must be respected and protected absolutely from the moment of conception.  From the first moment of his existence, a human being must be recognized as having the rights of a person – among which in the inviolable right of every innocent being to life.

‘Before I formed you in the womb, I knew you, and before you were born I consecrated you.’  (Jer 1:5)     

‘My frame was not hidden from you, when I was being made in secret, intricately wrought in the depths of the earth.’ (Ps 139.15)

2271  Since the first century the Church has affirmed the moral evil of every procured abortion.  This teaching has not changed and remains unchangeable.  Direct abortion, that is to say, abortion willed either as an end or a means, is gravely contrary to the moral law:

‘You shall not kill the embryo by abortion and shall not cause the newborn to perish.’  (Didache 2,2)

‘God, the Lord of life, has entrusted to men the noble mission of safeguarding life, and men must carry it out in a manner worthy of themselves.  Life must be protected with the utmost care from the moment of conception: abortion and infanticide are abominable crimes.’ GS 51 3

2272  Formal cooperation in an abortion constitutes a grave offense.  The Church attaches the canonical penalty of excommunication to this crime against human life.  ‘A person who procures a completed abortion incurs excommunication latae sententiae’ ‘by the very commission of the offense’ and subject to the conditions provided by Canon Law.  The Church does not thereby intend to restrict the scope of mercy.  Rather, she makes clear the gravity of the crime committed, the irreparable harm done to the innocent who is put to death, as well as to the parents and the whole of society.

2273  The inalienable right to life of every innocent human individual is a constitutive element of a civil society and its legislation:

‘The inalienable rights of the person must be recognized and respected by civil society and the political authority.  These human rights depend neither on single individuals nor on parents; nor do they represent a concession made by society and the state; they belong to human nature and are inherent in the person by virtue of the creative act from which the person took his origin.  Among such fundamental rights one should mention in this regard every human being’s right to life and physical integrity from the moment of conception until death.’  CDF Donum vitae III

‘The moment a positive law deprives a category of human beings of the protection which civil legislation ought to accord them, the state is denying the equality of all before the law.  When the state does not place its power at the service of the rights of each citizen, and in particular of the more vulnerable, the very foundations of a state based on law are undermined… As a consequence of the respect and protection which must be ensured for the unborn child from the moment of conception, the law must provide appropriate penal sanctions for every deliberate violation of the child’s rights.’  Donum vitae III

So, what are we to make of public figures such as Joe Biden and Speaker Pelosi who insist that they are being good, devout Catholics, while giving support and indeed even promotion and tax-payer dollars to what their faith describes as a mortal sin?  Further, that mortal sin that they have committed unrepentantly has not only brought great scandal upon the Catholic Church as it can and has given permission to those Catholics that are less well-versed in their faith, scripture, and catechization, to support this grave and mortal sin.  Catholicism teaches that in order to partake of the Eucharist, Holy Communion, one must not be in a state of mortal sin.  To partake anyway in such an unworthy fashion is to commit another grievous sin. 

And yet, many of our Catholic leaders still insist upon their own piety.  They disregard the very rules of the Church of which they profess to be members.  If they deny the sacredness of life from conception to natural death, then perhaps Catholicism is not a compatible faith for them.  Perhaps they should look for salvation elsewhere accordingly if they are invincibly ignorant in their steadfast support of abortion.

They certainly should not be propping themselves up as spokespeople for the Church when they are clearly and obstinately not abiding by its core tenets.  There are many bishops, including Nancy Pelosi’s own Archbishop Cordileone, that have instructed their dioceses not to distribute Holy Communion to such transgressors. 

Luckily, the sacrament of reconciliation offers Christ’s mercy to reestablish communion with the church for these transgressors, but they must truly be repentant for the support of this grave evil and work to not fall back into such sin.  In the meantime, it brings great shame and scandal to the church for such high-profile politicians to proclaim their Catholicity while blatantly ignoring its teachings. 

If Mitt Romney, as a Mormon were to be a heavy drinker and smoker and promote such things, he would likewise bring scandal to his church.  The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints would similarly be greatly dismayed as such intractable behavior that goes against their church laws.  Certainly one can understand that a group can establish its own rules.  Churches in particular have a right and obligation to do so.  Membership in such suggests that one is willing to abide by those organization's rules.  This becomes of the utmost importance when the rules are dictated by God himself!

Renowned Catholic apologist Jimmy Akin recently wrote,

“…someone who still professes to be Catholic—even unfaithfully—remains so, even if it is purely in a “bodily” way and not “in his heart.”

Although there is no doubt that public figures—as well as private individuals—gravely compromise their communion with the Church when they reject key Catholic teachings and values, this doesn’t mean that they literally cease to be Catholics.

Bad Catholics are still Catholics. And that just makes their betrayal of the Faith worse.”

Indeed, and that is why Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi may view themselves as devout, but their sins and hypocrisy is clear for all who know to see this.  Prayers for their conversions of heart is greatly needed from the truly devout accordingly.

 

3 comments:

Jerry said...

What of Republicans who profess to be Catholics, yet refuse to feed the starving, cloth the naked, or house the homeless? What if one is not a Catholic, or is an atheist? Are they sinners if they do not follow the laws of a church, or a God they do not recognize, or believe in? What right do Catholics have to force non-Catholics to live by Catholic laws?
Freedom is choice. Ban choice and you take away freedom. When our government bans anything they take away choice and dictate choice. Something I thought our government should be against.
There are many examples why religion should stay out of politics.
You seem to judge these individuals harshly. I thought judging individuals was to be left to God.
The God of the Old Testament was a murderous God proven over and over again. Who judges his murders? Can he not be judged? Can anyone judge your indiscretions except your God?
Food for thought. Lots of questions. Answer them all, some, or none.

Darrell Michaels said...

Jerry, I appreciate your thoughtful questions, sir.

If a politician does not follow the dictates of the Catholic faith in any regard so as to bring scandal to the Church, then that person should not go around publicly wrapping themselves up in the mantle of the Catholic faith. That is true for Democrats or Republicans. (For the record, I would expect Republicans from a political standpoint to use their private resources and time to help the poor, rather than increase the welfare state and thus impoverishing others through greater taxation by having the government do what we and our private organizations should be doing ourselves.)

And of course, I don't expect non-Catholics or atheists to be bound by many of the Church's teachings. They did not agree as non-Catholics to abide by such teachings. That said, some teachings such as "thou shall not murder" are pretty much universal natural and moral laws that transcend the Catholic faith. I would personally argue that killing an unborn child would fall into this category, but that is my personal opinion informed by logic and faith.

I judge Biden, Pelosi, and other such bad Catholic politicians harshly because they are supporting what God has taught is a grave evil and doing so while be spokespeople for the Church He created. I am hating the sin and not the sinner. And I assure you that they will be judged for their words and actions some day by the ultimate authority. I would pray that they repent rather than continue down this path towards damnation.

For something to be a mortal sin, it has to have three elements. One, it has to be of grave matter, such as murder. Two, the person must fully understand that it is a sin to cooperate in the commission of it. Three, the person must freely choose to commit the sin anyway. I would argue that life-long Catholics Biden and Pelosi fall into meeting those categories.

Non-Catholics, atheists, and such that may not have been fully catechized may not understand that abortion is a grave evil and sin, so are not necessarily subject to the punishments thereof. God is loving and merciful and He alone will judge in the end.

I do not support a theocracy ran by any faith, until Christ himself returns. And you are right that we are given free will to choose either right or wrong, good or evil. I am chastising Catholics that know better in their wrong and evil choices. I am not supporting government dictating the teachings of my church.

That said, protection of the innocent, which the unborn definitely qualifies should be the prime responsibility of any just government. As such, I will fight through my representatives and the legislative process to keep pushing for the abomination of abortion to be outlawed.

As for God of the Old Testament, he is one and the same with the God of the New. No one judges Him, as he is God. He created everything that is, including time. As creator of the universe, he is above all of us and can do with His creation what He wills. God is not constrained by the laws he set for us. His sacraments are for our good and not binding on him who created all, anymore than a parent is held to the same rules he sets for his young child.

Thanks for your comments, Jerry.

JTF, good to see you back, my friend. I hope you are doing well, sir!

Jerry said...

So God is free of murderous acts because he is God? What about following his own laws? The creator should set an example if he expects his creations to be loyal to his edicts. God killed off his own creations by flooding the world. By your logic he has the right to do what he wants with his creations. He killed the first born of Egypt in revenge for the enslavement of his children (the Jews). Sorry this makes no sense maybe because I am an atheist. The behavior of your God is one of a vengeful, murderous God.
I agree with you about those who claim to follow certain convictions, but then don't are hypocrites. Are Democrats the only hypocrites in politics?

It was proven long ago that charity by religious organizations was not nearly enough to meet the needs of the needy. If we took away government help millions would suffer and die. So even the religious, caring society we have approved, voted for, and are willing to pay taxes to help. I support that thinking. I don't support the runaway spending using that good idea to try to create a socialistic society. The people over almost 100 years and multiple generations support that spending. Government helping its people is not comparable to socialism. It's always the excess of any idea, or philosophy that causes the problem. I did not agree with wholesale corvid payments to the general public. If people were in need they should have had to apply and prove their need; and the government should be willing to help those in need.
If you agree non-Catholics are not bound by Catholic law, then how can you force those laws upon them through secular laws? You certainly would not agree if secular law told the church what they could or could not teach or practice. If churches pay no taxes, why should I have to make up the shortfall with my taxes. I don't want to subsidize churches. It confuses me why you insist on telling people how to live their lives or live their lives by your beliefs. I thought this was a free society.
You and I will never agree on these issues because you believe people should live by your beliefs and I think people have the right to live by their own beliefs even if they differ from yours.