Friday, July 24, 2015

Planned Parenthood and Moloch

In the time of the ancient Israelites, the Old Testament tells of periods when the Jews fell into apostasy and began to worship false gods and idols.  Among these pernicious straying’s from God included the worship of Moloch, with its rite of child-sacrifice, brought to them from the Ammonites during the 7th century B.C. 
 
"Then Solomon built a high place for Chemosh the detestable idol of Moab, on the mountain which is east of Jerusalem, and for Moloch the detestable idol of the sons of Ammon." ~ 1 Kings 11:7

The ancients would stoke a raging fire within this idol of Moloch and place their newborn babies in the arms of it thereby watching them burn to death in order to offer their sacrifices to him.

Leviticus 18:21 says, "Neither shall you give any of your offspring to offer them to Moloch, nor shall you profane the name of your God; I am the Lord."

This offering to the god-idol Moloch was done for the favor of the parent.

Nine thousand years later we are still sacrificing our children for the supposed favor of their parents. 

Planned Parenthood is at the very core of this despicable and evil sacrificing of our unborn children.  This vile organization has been riddled with scandal and controversy over the course of its entire existence.  From its founding by the racist eugenics proponent, Margaret Sanger, to more recent scandals of not reporting to legal authorities victims of sex trafficking or incest that had sought out abortions, we now have come across the latest publicized scandal: the selling of aborted baby body parts.

I was disgusted and horrified, like most Americans, as I watched the video of “Doctor” Deborah Nucatola – Planned Parenthood's Senior Director of Medical Services – dispassionately discuss over the course of her lunch of wine and salad how she skillfully killed unborn babies in a manner that preserved their organs in order that they could be harvested for sale for “medical researchers”.

"We've been very good at getting heart, lung, liver, because we know that, I'm not gonna crush that part, I'm gonna basically crush below, I'm gonna crush above, and I'm gonna see if I can get it all intact."

When the under-cover baby-parts “buyer” asked about getting the patient’s consent to harvest her child for its organs, Nucatola sounded exasperated:

“That’s probably the biggest inconvenience, ugh. That’s one more thing my staff has to talk about.”

Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards has apologized for Nucatola’s “tone” and manner of speaking.  This, in itself, tells how frightened Planned Parenthood is about the public backlash from this.  In all honesty, Richard’s apologetic remarks for Nucatola’s “tone” are inconsistent with their stated beliefs.  After all, if these aren’t really babies and are simply “tissue” specimens, why would Ms. Richards have to apologize for “Dr.”Nucatola’s tone when discussing the matter?  Nobody would need to apologize for simply “harvesting” tissue for use in medical research. 

The fact is these are absolutely recognizable living unborn babies that were sacrificed for the convenience of the parents.  Richards apologized because even some of the people that claim to be pro-abortion had to come face-to-face with the facts that these human children were being killed and their livers, heart, lungs, and other organs were “harvested” in the name of “research”. 

I don’t condemn those that feel so desperate that they see abortion as their only choice to deal with an unwanted pregnancy.  I feel extremely sorry for them and pray for God’s comfort, wisdom, and guidance for them.  I pray for the abortionists as well.  That said, what Planned Parenthood and other similar institutions do are nothing short of evil.  The killing of the unborn is inarguably against orthodox Christian and Jewish doctrine.  It is against Natural Law.  It is against common sense.

Moloch was an ancient false god whose worshippers sacrificed their children to him.  Today Moloch’s followers more commonly refer to him by his new name “Choice”.



Post Script:  The United States provides funding for Planned Parenthood via tax-payer dollars.  In 2014, the amount of public taxes that went to support them was nearly $550 million dollars – over a half of a billion dollars!

While I have yet to endorse any candidate for president thus far, Kentucky Senator Rand Paul has introduced an Amendment to bill H.R. 22 (the vehicle for the highway bill) that would defund Planned Parenthood of any further tax payer dollars.  While this evil institution needs to be eradicated, cutting all federal funding is a good first step.  Please sign this petition to your U.S. Congressman and Senators if you support Senator Paul’s efforts with his amendment. 

13 comments:

Burr Deming said...

Deborah Nucatola would have been well within her rights not to apologize at all. I kind of wish she hadn't.

It may be that you hadn't heard from your Fox Newscasts that there were actually two videos and that both were heavily edited to show what was not really there.

The videos were faked, Mr. Paine. jobsanger has a very short summary of the controversy that may save your readers some time.

T. Paine said...

Just like with MSNBC’s reporting, I guess I need to correct the record again.

True or false? Does Planned Parenthood sell body parts from aborted babies? Yes they do, as per the gruesome statement from “Dr.” Nucatola I quoted in my article.

Do you assert that this fact was misrepresented by me or is not accurate, Mr. Deming?

Next, I have long requested that the half billion dollars of tax payer money spent each year to subsidize this grotesque institution is removed. Finding that they give the body parts of the babies they kill to “medical research” only further convinces me that this needs to be done NOW. Do you dispute that they provide body parts from the aborted babies to researchers?

Last, the pertinent parts of the videos in question that I wrote my article upon were accurate and in complete context. It is amazing the contortions that the left will go through in order to defend their actions.

The fact of the matter is Planned Parenthood is a scandal-ridden organization that kills millions of unborn with the assistance of over $500 million annually in tax payer subsidies. Further, they often abort these children in such a way as to be able to “save” the victims’ organs for medical research. Dr. Mengele would be proud, despite President Cecile Richard’s apologies and protestations to the contrary that they are providing “services”. Woe to those that call evil, good and good, evil.

Jerry Critter said...

Hell! We would probably be better off if they had a billion in taxpayer subsides. I'd rather see the money go to Planned Parenthood than the bomb makers.

John Myste said...

“Planned Parenthood is at the very core of this despicable and evil sacrificing of our unborn children.” It is an interpolation, for sure. Molock likes them born, that’s for sure.

“I don’t condemn those that feel so desperate that they see abortion as their only choice to deal with an unwanted pregnancy. I feel extremely sorry for them and pray for God’s comfort, wisdom, and guidance for them.”

Good luck with that. God often targeted children when he was displeased with parents. Like Planned Parenthood, He considered them disposable. Unlike Planned Parenthood, He preferred them born and sentient. You cannot really hurt something until they reach this stage, and God needed the little tykes to suffer.

“It is against Natural Law.”

No, no, natural law explains it perfectly, but I do sympathize with you basic idea.

“Moloch was an ancient false god whose worshippers sacrificed their children to him.”

Moloch was an actual God, but the rest was accurate.

Today Moloch’s followers more commonly refer to him by his new name “Choice”.

C’mon. A blastocyste and a child cannot be considered identical. One is sentient, can feel pain, and the other is a germ.

However, I do sympathize with the gist of your idea. I do think atrocities are committed in the name of choice.

If you don’t know when feeling and sentience begins, you should be cautious about estimating it and calling the estimation reality.

T. Paine said...

Really, Mr. Deming? Your defense of Planned Parenthood is based on a pro-abortion op-ed article from New York Times and then a hyperbolic cartoon from a progressive pro-abortion blog?

Neither of the two undercover videos in question were “faked”. They released over two hours of the raw interviews, which were unedited, so that pro-abortion proponents wouldn’t be able to resort to the very claims you are making. I guess dishonesty also is in the eyes of the beholder. After all, whom should I believe? You? Or my own lying eyes?

Planned Parenthood sells aborted baby parts. Even if the amount for which these babies’ parts are sold only covers PP’s costs, that still constitutes selling. (Just not at a profit) If it were truly a donation, then there wouldn’t be fees associated with it. I have had stores such as the evil Wal-Mart donate cases of water for charitable events I was working at NO COST. That is what constitutes a donation.

Frankly, I could care less if they were donating or selling the baby parts regardless. Even if these are supposedly for more altruistic purposes, one should not do evil things for the purpose of good.

I personally would not be surprised if they were actually making a profit from these ghoulish transactions, but as of yet we have no evidence to support that other than the sick “joking” of the grandma-looking Planned Parenthood employee stating she wants a “Lamborghini” in exchange for the body parts. At the very least, that is exceptionally distasteful and unprofessional. At worst… well there seems to be no limit for the worst with this institution based on its history.

The fact that Nucatola is obviously annoyed with having to get permission to sell those parts shows her level of callousness and unprofessionalism, even if one were a pro-abortion proponent.

The condensed and edited versions of the videos initially released do not contradict the truth. The left’s defense, however, is evidently a different matter. This whole situation seems to be the very definition of secular ethics, in my opinion.

T. Paine said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
T. Paine said...

Jerry, paying for bombs and other armaments is something that the Constitution provides for in regards to our national defense. Killing our un-born is definitely not constitutional and a grotesque waste of our tax-payer dollars. The fact that we have totally embraced this culture of death in our nation now only shows that we have gone past the tipping point now.

T. Paine said...

"C’mon. A blastocyste and a child cannot be considered identical. One is sentient, can feel pain, and the other is a germ."

John, I am going to argue this for the reason I believe it. I know you don't believe this, but this is about me in this one instance.

A blastocyste is life. It is human life. It is worthy of our protection. Having sentience or the ability to feel pain doesn't degrade its worthiness to my mind.

Further, the ability to feel pain evidently is not a criterion for Planned Parenthood either. They evidently want longer term babies with developed organs who do feel pain that they can abort for "research". Aborting a 7 month termed baby is acceptable to them because it is still just "tissue". As anyone knows, traveling down that short stretch of birth canal is what transforms tissue into human life.

When Christ was conceived in Mary's womb, He started out as a blastocyste. Thank God that Planned Parenthood wasn't around back then as they would be trying to help her out since, she was an "unwed mother", to abort her child.

John Myste said...

“A blastocyste is life.”
Agreed

“ It is human life.”
Agreed (a human one, of course).

“ It is worthy of our protection.”
Disagreed. Two out of three aint bad.

“Further, the ability to feel pain evidently is not a criterion for Planned Parenthood either. They evidently want longer term babies with developed organs who do feel pain that they can abort for "research". Aborting a 7 month termed baby is acceptable to them because it is still just "tissue".

Aborting a 7 month old fetus is barbaric so far as I know. I am not defending Planned Parenthood (or even addressing them). I am defending the assumption that abortion is sometimes OK. That is a prerequisite to the Planned Parenthood discussion and without resolving that, we are speaking in tongues.

“When Christ was conceived in Mary's womb, He started out as a blastocyste.”

Blasphemy!

“Thank God that Planned Parenthood wasn't around back then as they would be trying to help her out since, she was an "unwed mother", to abort her child.”

What about Joseph?

T. Paine said...

"Aborting a 7 month old fetus is barbaric so far as I know. I am not defending Planned Parenthood (or even addressing them). I am defending the assumption that abortion is sometimes OK. That is a prerequisite to the Planned Parenthood discussion and without resolving that, we are speaking in tongues."

Why is aborting a 7 month old fetus barbaric to you, John? What criteria make it so? What makes abortion "sometimes OK"? Long ago you were taunting me about writing your opus on the subject of abortion. Did you ever do so, and I simply missed it? I would be very curious to read your in-depth thoughts and analysis on the topic, my friend.

To my way of thinking, an unborn child is still a human life. It doesn't matter if it is a blastocyste or 8.9999 months old from conception and two minutes away from being delivered into the world. I realize that your position on the topic is far more nuanced than many on the pro-abortion side of the aisle, but to many of them, that child that is minutes from being born is still just tissue and subject to abortion. Of course this defies logic and common sense, but it still is the truth nonetheless.

Say what you want about my position, but I am being consistent. Human life exists from the moment of conception until the point of death. How can one logically defend that an unborn child, at whatever stage of development, is not life and is not human? What arbitrary criteria can one place on that unborn child that logically, morally, and ethically determines whether that child's life can be terminated? Pain? Sentience? Self awareness? What precisely? Those are all things that can vary greatly from unborn child to unborn child. In the case of true self awareness, that typically doesn't occur until well after the child is born. Does that mean that even a born child could be subjected to a "post-birth abortion" as "Dr." Peter Singer has suggested?

Yes, I despise Planned Parenthood because they are one of the largest purveyors of abortion in this country. That they do so and then sell the body parts of their victims only exacerbates their evil. It does not mitigate it. They have seemingly violated federal and many state laws in doing so, even if one does not hold them accountable to moral law. Why we support this evil through tax payer dollars only further enrages me.

You know, I saw a picture the other day that really put this into cultural context for me. It showed a picture of the Confederate battle flag next to Planned Parenthood's logo. It asked the question, "Which was responsible for killing over 90,000 black babies last year?" It seems to me that, as a nation, we have our priorities seriously out of whack.

John Myste said...

“Why is aborting a 7 month old fetus barbaric to you, John? What criteria make it so?’

I don’t believe any sentient being should be killed for convenience. If you can experience pain, you have a right to be pain-free. Science has yet to offer credible evidence about when sentience begins. We know blastocysts are playing around with it, though.

“What makes abortion "sometimes OK"?

The little tykes are in our way.

“Long ago you were taunting me about writing your opus on the subject of abortion. Did you ever do so?”

I failed to abort another child and dropped out of the blogging world (mostly). I now have two un-aborted children. See what happens we don’t manage our abortion schedule with due diligence?

“To my way of thinking, an unborn child is still a human life.”

Being a human life has no special relevance to me. We say you can shoot a deer, and that is fine, because it is not human after all. An advanced alien race, the Summae, for example, may say: “Oh, he is a not a Summus, so killing him is OK. He is a low species of human, I think. They can’t even intellectually compete with their little computers, which are themselves, primitive. Killing Summus: bad, no matter at what stage, but it is a Summus. Killing human: OK. Why wouldn’t it be, OK? They are not a Summus.

I find that whole argument that it is wrong to cause something pain or to kill it because it is “not one of us,” to be rather baseless. I do agree that a blastocyst is both human and alive. Who cares? It is not a Summus, and Summae are what it really important. It would be barbaric to abort a Summus, of course.

Incidentally, I also consider Sperm to be both human and alive (human Sperm, of course, not Feline or Summus sperm). I don’t have a problem killing the Sperm. It is clearly non-sentient. It would be like killing a carrot.

Also, the poor little Sperm will die of natural causes if I don’t copulate, so should I have as much intercourse as possible? I think yes, in the name of humanity!

I think you have a religious notion of what it means to preserve a human. God is driving your philosophy and nothing else is. That is actually OK and legitimate. If I were of your opinion, I would embrace that as the reason. It is the foundation of your belief and all is vanity and striving after wind.

“Say what you want about my position, but I am being consistent.”

Indeed.

“Human life exists from the moment of conception until the point of death.”

I would challenge both of these assumptions as unproven and unknowable and unlikely.

“How can one logically defend that an unborn child, at whatever stage of development, is not life and is not human?”

I would never try. I accept axiomatically that it is a human and must be. No need to attempt to prove the obvious.

Miles Fraser said...

Check out this interview from former Satanic priest (11 years) Zachary King…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=td2rSF_KgYM

At 29 mins, he states that every night, there is an extended black mass (does not give the location) that dedicates all the aborted fetuses of the day to the Devil.

I always suspected this, but now we have an insider saying it is real. King participated in these black masses for several years.

Say the pre-Vatican II exorcism rite with the Prayer to St. Michael the Archangel in front of the Planned Parenthood offices in your area. Priests are not required to do this. Doing this is like plunging a dagger deep into the heart of Lucifer. Expect some form of backlash.

T. Paine said...

Wow! One more reason to pray for the end of abortion. I have attended prayer vigils in front of our local Planned Parenthood office in the past. I will look up the rite of which you speak. The petition to St. Michael is one I have often said, and will continue to say. Thanks for your contribution, Miles.