Co-founder of Greenpeace States There is No Evidence of Man-Caused Global Warming

Patrick Moore is a scientist and co-founder of Greenpeace.  He left Greenpeace because he said that since the mid-1980's the recent generation of directors had no formal scientific education and the organization had become "more about globalization and anti-capitalism than it is about science or ecology..."

This prompted Moore to write a book entitled, Confessions of a Greenpeace Dropout: The Making of a Sensible Environmentalist in which he exposes the green movement and explains why he left the organization.

Recently, Moore did a very interesting interview on Fox Business News with Stuart Varney in which he claims that, "We do not have any scientific proof that we are the cause of the global warming that has occurred over the last 200 years..."  He further states that the prophecies of disaster caused by anthropogenic global warming by many "environmentalists" are based on computer modeling and predictions that simply aren't accurate. 

This is an assertion that was backed by Dr. S. Fred Singer who was largely responsible for developing the observation satellites used to "capture" such environmental data.  Indeed, Dr. Singer has stated that these agenda-created "models are very nice, but they are not reality and they are not evidence."

It Is Criminal to Doubt Global Warming Says James Cameron & Google CEO

Google's CEO and movie director James Cameron both say it is "criminal" to doubt the "science" of global warming.  I guess the thought police will be funded with the next stimulus bill accordingly to prosecute such heresies.  Never mind the fact that man-caused global warming is very much an uncertainty, at best, according to thousands of expert scientists.

Instead, many ignorant people would rather take the words of Hollywood types, debunked former VP's, and large numbers of environmental agenda-driven extremists as the definitive authorities on the subject. I think I will continue to withhold judgement as real scientists work to find fact-based answers on the subject.

Mr. Cameron, might I suggest that you stick to making movies in the meantime, sir.

Climate Fools Day

The Carbon Sense Coalition today called on Americans to join the world in celebrating Climate Fools Day on October 27th.  The Chairman of “Carbon Sense”, Mr Viv Forbes, said that Climate Fools Day was dubbed as such by protesters outside the British House of Commons on 27th October 2008 when the house was debating the Climate Bill.  It was on that day that a large part of Europe, including London, was blanketed in the first October snowfall in over seventy years while members of British Parliament chattered on about the need to fight global warming.

I find this rather ironic as when I opened my garage door to leave to work today I found that a six inch blanket of snow covered my front yard... and drive way.  I guess I should have gotten the snow blower out of the shed in the backyard a little sooner instead of waiting until this weekend as I had planned.  (After all, I was sure that I wouldn't be in need of it so soon...)  It is still October for crying out loud!

As of today, I am definitely in favor of global warming.  In the summer time... not so much.

The Continuing Lies on Global Warming

Evidently the uncovering of more lies from those invested in the false religion of man-caused global warming are still leaking out, despite their best efforts at damage control regarding earlier leaks of emails and correspondence from "scientists" that had falsified some data and ignored contradictory data that failed to support their global warming agenda.

As Fox News reported on Monday 2/8/2010:

The U.N.'s controversial climate report is coming under fire -- again -- this time by one of its own scientists, who admits he can't find any evidence to support a warning about a climate-caused North African food shortage.

The statement comes from a key 2007 report to the U.N., and asserts that by 2020 yields from rain-fed agriculture could be reduced by up to 50% in some African countries thanks to climate change.

But this weekend, a key author of the team behind that report told The Sunday Times that he could find no evidence to support his own group's claim. The revelation follows the retraction by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) of a claim that the Himalayan glaciers might all melt by 2035, dubbed 'Glaciergate' by commentators.

The newest controversial claim could become a very important error in the IPCC's reporting, because it comes not only from the IPCC's report on climate change impacts -- called Assessment Report 4, or AR4 -- but is also repeated in its "Synthesis Report." That report is the IPCC's most politically sensitive publication, distilling its most important science into a form accessible to politicians and policy makers.

Unfortunately, there are those in powerful positions throughout the world that rely upon this science to either further this false religion's agenda intentionally or are naive enough to be duped into accepting this discredited "science" as being real.

Fox News continued:

Its lead authors include IPCC chairman Rajendra Pachauri himself, who has quoted it in speeches, as has U.N. secretary-general Ban Ki-moon.

Speaking at the 2008 global climate talks in Poznan, Poland, Pachauri said: "In some countries of Africa, yields from rain-fed agriculture could be reduced by 50% by 2020." In a speech last July, Ban said: "Yields from rain-fed agriculture could fall by half in some African countries over the next 10 years."

Speaking this weekend, Professor Chris Field, the new lead author of the IPCC's climate impacts team, said: "I was not an author on the 'Synthesis Report,' but on reading it I cannot find support for the statement about African crop yield declines."

This sort of claim should be based on hard evidence, said Robert Watson, chief scientist at Defra, the U.K.'s department for environment food and rural affairs, who chaired the IPCC from 1997 to 2002.

"Any such projection should be based on peer-reviewed literature from computer modelling of how agricultural yields would respond to climate change. I can see no such data supporting the IPCC report," he said.

The danger of these falsified and misleading reports based on bad "science" is that world leaders are reliant on what they assume are objective and critical-thinking scientists and their work to determine what should be done to stem such predicted calamities.

When the "science" behind anthropogenic global warming is dubious at best and largely discredited at worst for them, one wonders why the vilification and denouncements of those questioning this by those claiming this is a true phenomenon. The purpose of science is to find the truth; not to manipulate data to support a conclusion upon which one has already arrived.

Considering the scores of billions of dollars spent, businesses destroyed, and economies severely weakened all in the name of anthropogenic global warming, I think this con-game should be called what it is. Those that knowingly contributed to falsifying data and perpetrating this hoax should be prosecuted, fined, and thrown in jail for the rest of their natural lives. This "science" has affected untold millions of people throughout the world. Justice for those that have had to pay the price for this false religion by its false prophets should be given.

More Damning Evidence of the Global Warming Hoax

Russia's Institute of Economic Analysis reported on 12/15 that the Hadley Center for Climate Change in England had falsified their findings based on data obtained from Russian meteorological stations. Evidently the Hadley Center used only 25 percent of the existing Russian stations as they were the only ones supporting their agenda-driven theory of anthropogenic global warming. This effectively cut out data from stations from over 40% of the Russian territory. Further, the data that the Hadley Center did use was incomplete as they purportedly left out any data that did not corroborate their theory of global warming in the late 20th and early 21st centuries.

As Russia occupies 12.5% of the earth's entire landmass, this egregious and pernicious use of only the supporting data for their agenda obviously throws out the validity of any "scientific" conclusions for which the Hadley Center for Climate Change has arrived.

As those with common sense knew all along, man-made global warming is a gigantic hoax. This simply is an agenda for consolidation of power by governments and a means to extort more tax dollars in order to "save the planet".

These people have struck unwarranted fear into billions of people's hearts with their nonsense, cost untold billions of dollars in world-wide economies, and helped to bankrupt corporations (especially American car companies) all in the name of something that does not exist. This is not a mistake on their behalf. It is intentional and it is criminal and morally wrong. Too bad that these people that foisted this hoax upon us probably won't be held to answer for this.

Of course the left will continue to deny this is a hoax and Al Gore will continue to call us "deniers of truth" names such as "flat earthers" etc. but the evidence is mounting in incontrovertibly huge amounts that lay waste to their lies. So, Mr. Gore, I will take my extra chromosome and continue to believe what SCIENCE is telling us and not what you and your ilk are spewing in an attempt to rake in even more power and dollars for yourselves. Personally, I think you should have stopped after having invented the Internet, sir, instead of creating this false religion of global warming.

Copenhagen Hypocrisy

Once again the enviro-whackos' hypocrisy is on full display; this time at the global warming summit in Copenhagen Denmark this week. Evidently, these fools and charlatans are continuing their global warming power grabbing agenda as if the truth had not been made public that their own "scientists" falsified and ignored contrary data in their global warming research. They are pretending as if those leaked emails from their own researchers never happened, and that global warming really isn't a hoax.

Regardless though, the hypocrisy of these elitist idiots is amazing. It has been reported that ALL of the limousines in Copenhagen have been rented and they have had to send out as far as Germany and Sweden for people to bring in additional limousines for these visiting dignitaries at this summit. To top that off, only five of the 1200 non-private limos there are hybrid or electric.

Further there are over 140 private jets that have come in with various dignitaries for this summit too. The Copenhagen airport is not able to handle that many jets, so many of them have dropped off their elitist occupants and then flown to surrounding airports to park and wait. Presumably they will fly back to get them and fly home after the summit ends next week.

All of this, plus the huge contingent that accompanies any president and Air Force One will be there next week as Lord Obama arrives at the conference to put in his two cents on how we should destroy what is left of the American and world economies all for the purported reason of saving the world from non-existent anthropogenic global warming.

The fact is that if the U.S. becomes signatories to the wishes of this summit's members, we will be giving up much of our sovereignty and destroying what is left of our economy. If Obama thinks 10.2% unemployment right now is bad, just wait to see what happens if this nonsense is enacted.

Luckily congress would have to ratify any treaty to which Lord Obama agrees; however, with Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi at the reigns there, it is not certain that this would be rejected there either.

After all, this global warming hysteria isn't really about saving the planet; it is about consolidating power in the world's governments. If there truly was a fear of imminent disaster from global warming, one would think that even these elitist power-grubbing snobs would not be producing a carbon footprint for this two week summit that rivals that of the continent of Africa's... or would they?